Friday, October 28, 2005
Sometime after September 11, those blokes at the CIA realised that suicide bombers are a bit looney and they decided to do some criminal profiling to see what kind of people would most likely be a suicide bomber. After spending millions of dollars and in collaboration with other intelligence agencies like the Mossad and MI6, they realised that there isn't a fixed profile. The suicide bomber and be any average Joe. Labels: blogs
One of the London bombers was a teacher - a model citizen. Those guys sure are hard to pick out. But I tell you what is easy to pick out. The extremists. The nutters. The sick in the head cuntfaces who hate everybody.
People like this and this. The same people who can come up with shit like this and this.
So much for our 'tolerant-respect-other-people's-culture' society right? Bangsa Malaysia? With these kind of people around, I don't think it's going to happen anytime soon.
If you think about it, its quite weird how people just lie in wait to pounce on Xiaxue, even though she had long established that her brains were the size of bacteria stuck on the pebble in my shoe. She's a stupid kid who has no malicious intent and obviously doesn't know what she's talking about. Compare her with these two extremists who quite clearly know what they are doing and make no apologies for spurting their hate on the rest of us....
I just wonder where our priorities lay sometimes...
btw, welcome back
viewtru : Exactly dude. But I am annoyed that people seem to be picking a bone with a harmless kid when the real menaces are all out there and nobody bothers about them.
People tend to take the easier route. Their mistake.
bump da sucka kimberlypukiflatface!!!!!!!
IF ANYONE EVER SEE HER AT THE ROAD PLS RAM INTO HER AND MAKE HER FACE EVER FLATTER THAN PUKI THAN IT ALDY IS!!!!!!!!!!!!HAHAHAHHAHAHA
No, they are nobodies, no one cares.
And yes many people commented on Menj's entry, including myself..Quite a lot of people blogged about it. Religion is however a sticky issue, especially here, which is a religious country, state and religion are not seperate entities.
And BTW, who are you? Self appointed minister of morals, what people should care about and what people should blog about?
I think not, go follow your master, she might give you something interesting to write about with your 'class and tact', I don't think I should be here anyway, obviously far too classy for me.
I am just another ignorant dumbfuck chastising a small kid, I wish I can be so superior like you and go after the big matters, like which tampons absorb more water.
Have a great weekend back in Malaysia dude.
Actually, this is a vicious cycle..If you are speaking as a person with authority and with experience, most will not critise you because you are not performing what you are preaching. Everyone of us has opinions. This is just one of them.(ST, same as your educating the masses load.No?)
It's NOT that easy to slam someone who claims himself to be a so-called expert. In fact, for someone like him (or them), the less attention you pay to them, the better.
Of course if you don't pay attention to them, it's like sweeping bigotry under the carpet, where it will be allowed to breed like all the bacteria that you know.
Fact is - Xiaxue gets slammed because she's an easy target. Menj, not so.
Perhaps sometimes it's not about priorities, but it's what close to your heart.
For Kimberlycun, Peter and ST, it's about civic-consciousness and disability issues. These are the issues they believe in and feel strongly about. For lainie and minishorts, the things that irk them could be about journalistic issues (generalizing from the Cicak's "backlash"). For you, you clearly having strong beliefs/hopes about national unity and racial harmony.
How do you rank what's more important than the other? By saying that because Menj spreads hatred and racial intolerance, he could cause another May 16? Or that because XX has a wide readership, all her readers will be influenced to become less emphathetic?
Everyone should be allowed to stand for what they believe in..the problem is how they do it and say it.
...i dunno. juz sometimes wish that this type of people would juz vanish or go away. been eaten by a beast or whatever. >D ah. evil me.
Funny how you talk about my master. Have you redeemed your coupon to a free blowjob? Or do you get it everyday anyway?
jo : You have a VERY good point there.
Actually i think its okay for the celebrations would not affect each traditions in each way or obstruct whatsoever.
I do not believe in going after trivial things like this because it is never-ending.
If you're a follower of a clan/tribe/religion of course you believe it is the strongest, isnt it?
Oh, I'm agnotiscism by the way.
grr, anyway don't get irritated by things written by them. to ME, they are just too egoistic to notice things that shld be done for the benefit of many and not just for their own sake. Wars are started by these people.
*This comment is made in good intentions.*
And yes it is about readership, if a newspaper does something wrong, and they only have a circulation of 5, why bother about it? It's not going to have any major effect on society right? If a newspaper has a circulation of 150,000 and they print something that isn't 'right' then it's worth investing the effort in to do something about correct? Cause and effect are something you need to study a little more my dear child.
And when was Britney spears racist or prejudiced against the disabled? I must have missed that? Please point me to the articles.
Blowjob coupon? Nah I'm waiting for you to rim my ass, you seem inclined to that kind of behaviour.
What jo said is essentially correct, it's about making a point, civic conciousness and social responsibility. And yes as I've said MANY times, it's not WHAT you say, it's HOW you say it.
"Cause and effect are something you need to study a little more my dear child." <= Lol. I thought in your blog, you stated that in an arguement, you do not assume you know more than the other party. If so, why bother arguing with an idiot, you are a fool for making that conscious choice. Because you think you can think and the other cannot.
"What jo said is essentially correct, it's about making a point, civic conciousness and social responsibility. And yes as I've said MANY times, it's not WHAT you say, it's HOW you say it." <= It is not stated in your previous entry.
People with utmost faith in their religions are different from people with blind and ignorant ideas inferred from their religions. I feel that the guy's blog is just to broadcast his faith, a structure to keep his world steady. He is certainly not racist because he just feel insulted that the two religions' ideas crash on the same day. Same day/week to celebrate, different ideas to explain.<= It causes confusion.
And I'm not talking about Menj, I have not posted about him, I'm talking about XX. Menj is not a form of mass media, Menj is a religious fundementalist, Menj does not have endorsement deals, althought I may not always agree with what he says, he is welcome to voice his opinions, people don't publish articles in the newspaper recommending that everyone reads his blog, the people who read his blog are interested in his message.
ra it's an endless circle, then why can I not lambast vincent for his views? I am just expressing my opinion on his opion on the other people's opinion right?
vincent rockss! xiaxue rocks! and anonymous rocks! this blog is about vincent and anonymous!!!!have fun everyone~
ST : One question. Which is worse...14K people reading about a stupid kid talking about using disabled toilets and hurling random racist remarks on a pink blog or a CONFIRMED religious bigot spreading his shit to 200 odd people?
We can both agree that XX hasn't a clue what she is doing or talking about, but can we say the same for MENJ who knowing spews his hate and racial intolerance everywhere? If you think that XX is worse, then this argument ends here. I think that even if MENJ spews hate to just ONE person, he should be locked up.
VINCE: HAPPY BIRTHDAY HAPPY BIRTHDAY OK when we meet up this week we have a double celeb. see ya.
YOU GUYS SERIOUSLY take blogs FAR TOO SERIOUSLY.
I happen to think neither of you blog with class.
wanna learn class? read cowboy caleb. as for me, i never did admitted to being classy.
the endorsements are her livelihood!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!pls dun play with her life u all!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ok dun flame me or no need for reply!!!!!!!!!!!!!byebye!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
HOWEVER! I honestly believe that all of us should watch out for MENJ. He should NEVER EVER be elected into any political position and should NEVER EVER be given any opportunity to do so.
Give him half the chance, he might overthrow the Msian government. Sounds absurd but let us all remember that Pol Pot took control of Cambodia with hardly any resistence from the people and thousands upon thousands of Cambodians were killed by a small community of sick people. People like Pol Pot serve us with a grave reminder how important the voice of the nation is.
I am not upset with what MENJ writes about religion. I am upset that he does not show much empathy for anyone else who does not share similar views as he does. It worries me that he has political ambitions. It worries me because MENJ goes against simple moral and ethic codes = justice, truth, honour, respect, love, kindness etc.
I believe every person that passes on deserves some respect, immaterial who they are - good/bad/whatever religion etc. Him labeling Datin Sri Endon "tudungless" was a tasteless act and shows what he truly is inside.
I can go on and on and on about MENJ but I rather do something more productive with my time.
Selamat Hari Raya and Happy Deepavali, folks. Cheers from me.